Nykredit in Spain, with offices in Marbella (Centro Comercial Plaza), could see all of its Spanish loans declared void by the Courts.
The reason is no other than the appalling wording of many clauses of their standard Spanish mortgage loan contract, notably the “applicable interest rate” clause.
This extraodinary discovery happened when lawyers acting for a victim of Nykredit’s nefarious Marbella branch, who had been served with a foreclosure Court claim, analysed with a fine-tooth comb the wording of the loan contract…only to conclude that it was impossible to establish which rates were applicable and crucially, what was the total sum owed when repossession proceedings got underway.
Lawyers have concluded, following 48 hours of collective ‘brainstorming’, that it is not possible to arrive at a discernible figure on the above concepts.
Now let’s see how Nykredit’s clever Danish lawyers worded the diverse formulas used by the bank to charge interest and calculate outstanding balances:
The value as certified by the Copenhaguen Stock Exchange.
In case of disappearance of the above, the value certified by any other Public Administrative Body.
The “market” value.
The market value paid by Nykredit for the “underlying bonds”.
An amount that could be, in any event, different from the “OBL RESTGAELD” debt.
The value of bonds issued under code “ISIN”.
A formula totally different from the above, in case Nykredit decided to use the prerrogative given to itself of not “taking the above into consideration”.
Quite!
Startled borrowers have stated that if the mortgage loan had been left in Danish language, they would have stood a better chance of grasping something.
In addition to this bungle but as a consequence of the above, NYKREDIT’s Alicante-based lawyers made a total mess in their Court repossession paperwork when, in a futile attempt to cheat the Courts (and their customers), attached the obligatory Outstanding Balance Statement without reflecting the mandatory calculations, without the Notary Public certifying those (when the melon was supposed to ensure the Statement was consistent with the wording of the loan contract clauses, article 218 of the “Reglamento Notarial”) and worst of all, forgetting to legalize the signature of the person ratifying the Statement (a Sussie Nyholm, who at the time happened to be in Denmark, or just as always be believe because she lives there…).
And to cap it all, as for applicable law, Nykredit expressly noted the following:
This loan will be subject to Spanish laws and Courts.
Should the Courts declare void the above 2 clauses in the loan contract, by application of Spanish Consumer laws and notably, the recent 2013 European Court of Justice ruling, the following could happen:
- Foreclosure proceedings are set aside, with costs (circa €70k).
- Only some clauses are declared void, forcing Nykredit to instigate repayment in normal declaratory proceedings where, unbeknown to the lender, a 50-page claim has been lodged against them and their sidekick, Sydbank, for running an illegal Equity Release scheme.
- The mortgage loan is declared void, with unknown legal consequences.
- The entire Nykredit loan book in Spain, Equity Release or not, face the threat of having their legality challenged in Courts.
What a potential mess for Nycredit/Sydbank, if only they had the sense to be up front and honest with their clients and victims of the equity release scheme sold by theses institutions. Not only have they flaunted the Spanish Laws by selling illegal products to Spanish victims, they are treating the Spanish legal system and courts as dumb sculls. Thank goodness the victims have chosen the same legal representatives (Lawbird Legal Services) as Erva to fight their case. Antonio Flores is a formidable lawyer who should not be underestimated and has demonstrated his desire to see all victims of equity release products released from the clutches of all the scrupulous banks.
How are they going to fight their way out of this one they should be nicknamed “Houdini Bank” Is this not precisely what we have read on the Erva website, where banks have been found guilty of applying unfair mortgage rates I think they were called “floor charges or something” In this case of course no one seems to know what the interest rates are. However if the bank doesn’t like them then they go on to the next one on the list, always of course having a final get out of jail clause that gives them “carte blanche” to do whatever they want. What I don’t understand is how these were not picked up by the Notary Public when the mortgage deed was signed up to. Or, are you telling us that the mortgage deeds were never notarised in Spain, but in Denmark or Luxembourg or some other banana republic as we have seen in the case of Nordea & Danske Bank contracts.
It is worth remembering that (some of) the spivs in the banking/mortgage/investment industry enjoy “protection” from some very powerful people in government …. simply because these “politicians” are also involved in (almost) impenetrable tax evasion schemes and other big time financial intrigue…
Shine light into this murky world of financial crime and who knows who would be exposed …
This is why demands for justice from innocent people are hastily squashed at any signs of investigations that could also compromise their dirty tricks.
Time for a thorough clean-out.
Starting at the very top!
can anyone tell me the lastest news on what is happening with Nykredit claims?
we have two mortgages and i cannot see if we have this clause.
we took out our mortgages in year 2005.